Ophthotech Announces Results from Pivotal Phase 3 Trials of Fovista® in Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- No benefit observed upon addition of Fovista® to monthly Lucentis® regimen for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration -
-
Conference Call and Webcast Today,
December 12, 2016 at8:30 a.m. ET -
"We are very disappointed in the results from these trials, particularly
for patients afflicted with wet AMD," commented
The two clinical trials (OPH1002 and OPH1003) were international, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, controlled Phase 3 studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of 1.5 mg of Fovista® administered in combination with Lucentis® (Fovista® combination therapy) compared to Lucentis® monotherapy. In each of these trials, patients were randomized to one of two approximately equal sized treatment groups. The two Phase 3 trials enrolled an aggregate of 1,248 patients with wet AMD. The results from the databases of the two trials were unmasked and analyzed concurrently.
The combined analysis from the two trials (OPH1002 and OPH1003) showed that patients receiving Fovista® combination therapy gained a mean of 10.24 letters of vision on the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) standardized chart at 12 months, compared to a mean gain of 10.01 ETDRS letters for patients receiving Lucentis® monotherapy, a difference of 0.23 ETDRS letters. In OPH1002, consisting of 619 treated patients, subjects receiving Fovista® combination therapy gained a mean of 10.74 letters of vision on the ETDRS standardized chart at 12 months, compared to a mean gain of 9.82 ETDRS letters in patients receiving Lucentis® monotherapy, a resulting difference of 0.92 ETDRS letters (p=0.44). In OPH1003, consisting of 626 treated patients, subjects receiving Fovista® combination therapy gained a mean of 9.91 letters of vision on the ETDRS standardized chart at 12 months, compared to a mean gain of 10.36 ETDRS letters in patients receiving Lucentis® monotherapy, a resulting difference of -0.44 ETDRS letters (p=0.71). None of these results of the pre-specified primary efficacy analysis were statistically significant.
In the pooled analysis of pre-specified secondary endpoints from both trials, 24.2% of patients receiving Fovista® combination therapy gained 20 or more ETDRS letters from baseline at month 12, compared to 22.1% of patients receiving Lucentis® monotherapy. In OPH1002, 25.9% of patients receiving Fovista® combination therapy gained 20 or more ETDRS letters from baseline at month 12, compared to 20.0% of patients receiving Lucentis® monotherapy. In OPH1003, 22.5% of patients receiving Fovista® combination therapy gained 20 or more ETDRS letters from baseline at month 12, compared to 24.1% of patients receiving Lucentis® monotherapy.
In the pooled analysis, 12.1% of patients receiving Fovista® combination therapy lost 5 or more ETDRS letters from baseline at month 12, compared to 11.2% of patients receiving Lucentis® monotherapy. In OPH1002, 12.0% of patients receiving Fovista® combination therapy lost 5 or more ETDRS letters at month 12, compared to 12.3% of patients receiving Lucentis® monotherapy. In OPH1003, 12.2% of patients receiving Fovista® combination therapy lost 5 or more ETDRS letters at month 12, compared to 10.2% of patients receiving Lucentis® monotherapy.
In addition, in the pooled analysis, 13.5% of patients receiving Fovista® combination therapy achieved visual acuity of 20/25 or better at month 12, compared to 13.9% of patients receiving Lucentis® monotherapy. In OPH1002, 13.6% of patients receiving Fovista® combination therapy achieved visual acuity of 20/25 or better, compared to 13.2% of patients receiving Lucentis® monotherapy. In OPH1003, 13.5% of patients receiving Fovista® combination therapy achieved visual acuity of 20/25 or better, compared to 14.6% of patients receiving Lucentis® monotherapy.
Based on a preliminary analysis of the safety data from these two trials, Fovista® combination therapy and Lucentis® monotherapy were generally well tolerated after one year of treatment. The ocular adverse events more frequently reported in the Fovista® combination therapy group compared to the Lucentis® monotherapy group were mainly related to the injection procedure. The incidence of reported serious systemic adverse events was generally similar in both treatment groups as was the incidence of myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident.
Conference Call Information
About
Forward-looking Statements
Any statements in this press
release about Ophthotech's future expectations, plans and prospects
constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor
provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements include any statements about Ophthotech's
strategy, future operations and future expectations and plans and
prospects for
OPHT-G
View source version on businesswire.com: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161211005098/en/
Investors
Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate
Communications
kathy.galante@ophthotech.com
or
Media
SmithSolve
LLC on behalf of Ophthotech Corporation
alex.vanrees@smithsolve.com
Source:
News Provided by Acquire Media